bruce wegmann wrote:Oh, I've been through more than my fair share of that...I could direct you to the threads, but you'll have more fun browsing and finding them on your own [if you haven't already seen them...]. I knew collectors could be competitive, but for sheer nerve and downright mean-spiritedness, I've bumped into a few who set a whole new high [or would it be low?] standard. Stay tuned for future developments...
yes ,you have hit the hail on the head here.
i made a simple request to say i have an item for sale,i had problems with that photo shak ,whatever you call it , and thought it would be much better simply to send my high res pics to any interested parties.
firstly thanks to bucko for trying to actually help me.
(still have problems with it) however gee whizz whats the problem ? if your interested you click a mouse to ask for some pics.if you like it fine ,if you dont thats also fine.
the six e mailers who responded had no problem with this,i have no problem with it,but ed obviously has.
the item went to a wonderful woman from the states who bought it for her husbands birthday.nice
however ed just couldnt help but drag some old argument from last year to the surface.after all he had no interest in the item some why cast up some old crap.
i think possibly a tad of jelously and a huge chip on his shoulder may be the cause. who knows.(getting in on his patch i fear)
its a shame he seams to have short temper and its my way or no way attitude , all very childish and imature. i am shure many would agree.
lighten up ,let your hair down, and live a little .
by the way i have a mint boxed led watch from cleopatras personal collection.very early technology ,uses grains of sand instead of a quartz crystal and you need to sit on top of a pyramid to recharge it.
im sittin on top of the world ,just rolling along singing a song
thats entertainment folks!

.