18 Nov 2013, 08:52
First off, "Pulsar" is a BRAND NAME...Time Computer is the manufacturer.
Now, let it be known for all time, that Time Computer offered only a single (as, in ONE), texturing option on any of their models; the 7408 (Men's Dress in 14K solid gold) could be ordered as the 7409, which was the same watch, with the case and bracelet done in Florentine finish. AFAIK, only two examples exist; one in my collection, and the other with Lloyd Harvey (if there are others, I invite the owners to speak up). So, all these oddball variations, such as the 14K P3 in the trapdoor bracelet, or on sterling silver/turquoise bracelets, or this watch, were done at customer request by local jewelers, completely unconnected to Time Computer, and so add no special value to the watch (and indeed, to the great majority of collectors, actually lessens it...same goes for engravings, unless they are attached to someone of particular interest...celebrity, head of state, that sort of thing).
John, you've got some really peculiar notions about how provenance (the exact, known history of an object, especially its' connection to a specific person) affects the value of something (and I mean ANYthing...jewelry, painting, coin, clothing, book, document, watch, for example). It's the MORE we know, the higher the value, not less (mystery counts for nothing in this regard, and as for beauty, that remains in the eye of the beholder, and I think it would take a very special eye to see the beauty here...even the Grima watches have their detractors, and, at least, they were made by a respected, world-class jewelry designer for Time Computer, and are legitimate Pulsar watches). As far as I can see, the real mystery here is why you think this will sell for so much more, just because YOU are selling it (in my world, it doesn't work that way). As for not having a watch like this, I will just have to do my best to derive some sense of compensation out of having ten P1s in my collection...